There’s two major arguments for Graffiti not being included under the heading “Art”. The first is obviously because it’s a crime. The second is that it is essentially graphic design- not hugely different from a logo or an advertisement. So while those that agree with the former figure out whether or not Modernism during Nazi Germany is not art for the same reason, Ganz sets out to roundly convince us that graphic design is not even the beginning of Graffiti culture.
As he points out, many of the artists included in the book deliberately distance themselves from the word “Graffiti”. By tradition, the word Graffiti can be applied to everything from the political statements that dissidents would scratch into stone walls in ancient
Known usually as “tags”, written in marker pen or spraypaint, you can find this sort of graffiti just about any bare wall in a given city. Although the taggers themselves originally referred to the practice as “writing”, it is this practice which led newspapers to assign the term “Graffiti”. It’s the stigma related to this term, where it can often be demonized as much as drug abuse and theft that has led to this dissociation.
Ganz’s decision to stick with the outsider’s term “graffiti art” has the dual purpose of keeping us unenlightened familiar with the subject, and blanketing a practice that in actuality has gone far past aerosols. Stencils, paper cut outs, oil based chalk and marker pen, mosaic, wooden and plastic carving as well as traditional oil and acrylic brushing are all tools of the modern graffiti artist. The pieces that appear in the book are not limited to walls and the side of trains either. From canvas to cliff face, to empty cans to a painted frame snuck into the Louvre, it’s arguable that no single visual art has found so many ways into the public conscience.
Exhaustively documenting every style from the tiniest of symbols to ten storey high scaffold painted murals, Ganz presents Graffiti as at worst a little piece of expression in a dull urban landscape. As if an aspiring composer snuck into your house in the night and replaced your microwave beep with an original composition. At best, Graffiti appears as something of lasting significance, to be studied and dissected like any gallery piece.
But it’s still just a bunch of fools writing their names on everything isn’t it? Well, yes and no. You have to go back to tagging’s hip hop roots to really grasp the significance of the writing. The bragging and challenging of rivals in hip hop are reflected in the straight assertion of a tag. The use of a spray can and the use of public space as canvas reflect the process of rhyming over another artist’s music. But more importantly both forms are a protest against oppression, a reclaiming of public space. Even more so, it is art because it is engaged in for its own sake. As many artists state in the book, they write on compulsion. The signatures are drawn so impossibly complex and riddled with pictures within pictures that they become almost impossible to read. It takes a well trained eye to recognize the meanings and homages reflected in the lettering style and construction. And then there’s that often repeated quote about fleeting beauty- each piece is as temporary as the next council clean up.
Having said that, “Graffiti World” is not a book that plods around too much about cause, effect or cultural difference. As if to make a point of this exclusion, Ganz has deliberately ordered the artists alphabetically by continent, rather than country or even sex. Listing most of the artists by their writing name has the effect of further blurring these distinctions. That’s not to say these factors are not touched upon, its merely that the broad scope of the book leaves little room for in depth discussion.
But even with these loose groupings, it is possible to pick trends as you read through.
As Graffiti art has spread its influence away from the
High art culture has had a similar relationship with Street Graffiti. While in some circles Graffiti art has penetrated the Gallery, and there are some artists who have foregone street art to work solely in this format, there will always be those who believe it has a place in neither. If nothing else, such debates will always keep the innovators pushing for new ideas and the traditionalists, well, traditional.
No comments:
Post a Comment